Aside

View Chart

Why Nestle-Aland Is No Longer The Leader

Griesbach, Lachmann, Tischendorf, Tregelles, Westcott & Hort, Nestle-Aland, and the United Bible Societies are no longer the leader for many reasons. One of the main reasons is that they do not use advanced technologies; especially, digigraphic technologies.
Why Nestle-Aland Is Wrong

Griesbach, Lachmann, Tischendorf, Tregelles, Westcott & Hort, Nestle-Aland, and the United Bible Societies are wrong because their principles are incomplete. They do not accept all of the principles found in the Bible. They only accept those Bible principles accepted by people who do not believe the Bible.

The Sanity Interview

Interviewer: Dr. Bisconti, what Greek-Hebrew text did the King James Bible translators enshrine (teach us to respect above all others)?
Dr. Bisconti: None, though we know what sources they used, including, among others, Textus Receptus texts and Masoretic texts, and their sources reveal that they were more interested in truth than tradition.

Interviewer: Why, then, do you enshrine the (Greek-Hebrew) Digigraph Text?
Dr. Bisconti: We don’t.

Interviewer: What, then, is the purpose of the Digigraph Text?
Dr. Bisconti: People need a digigraphic, not human, summary of the unimaginably massive amount of manuscript and other data that must be processed by scholars.

Interviewer: Does the Digigraph Text agree with the sources used by the King James Bible translators?
Dr. Bisconti: Yes, but the Digigraph Text, through the Bisconti tags, (digitally) references an additional one trillion pages of source data, information, and principles.

Our Auxiliary Computer CenterFirstThe Bible teaches that there can be only one correct family of compilations (Greek-Hebrew texts [group {singular} of compilations]) of all of the ancient manuscripts of the Bible and this is the King James Bible family of compilations of all of the ancient manuscripts of the Bible. The difference(s) between the compilations is alphabetic and neither orthographic (relating to spelling) nor semantic (relating to meaning); for example, here is the name of God in two different Hebrew alphabets:

Hebrew Alphabets

Changing the alphabet did not change the meaning. Changing the alphabet did not change God’s message. Changing the alphabet aided understanding.

AutowritWikiwritManuscript PortalLionwrit VaultNotice: Our website is in constant flux because of the never-ending, frequent updating of our content while on-line. This means, at times, there may appear to be errors and broken links. Just wait a short time and they will correct themselves.